June 16, 2006; 6:00 A.M., PT; Updated
There was one particular, heated debate in the House Of Representatives as far back as September, 2000, as to the moral and legal viabilities of the termination of late term pregnancies - partial-birth abortion; which yielded then recent revelations of factual truths from Representatives and LEADING MEDICAL AUTHORITIES regarding the partial-birth abortion procedure, legalized in the U.S.A.
( The graphic descriptions below are of a most sensitive, disturbing nature.)
Representative Charles Canady R-Fla: " This House (of Representatives) has the responsibility to do everything in its power, notwithstanding the President's (Clinton's) stubborn support for partial-birth abortion, to put an end to the practice that has no place in a civilized society. This House cannot remain silent while a practice such as partial-birth abortion is being performed across this land. An abortionist named Dr. Martin Haskell described the procedure in a paper in 1992 : "
Dr. Martin Haskell, Abortionist: " The abortionist, in the first step of the procedure, guided by ultra sound, grabs the live baby's leg with forceps. The abortionist then goes to step two in which the baby's leg is pulled into the birth canal. Third, the abortionist then delivers the living baby's entire body, except for the head which is deliberately kept lodged just within the woman's cervix. The abortionist then jams scissors into the baby's skull, and the scissors are spread to enlarge the incision. Finally, the scissors are removed, and a suction catheter is inserted. The child's brains are removed by the suction causing the skull to collapse, and the 'delivery of the child' is then completed."
Is it your opinion, friends and guests, from the above described procedure, that partial-birth abortion is cruel and unusual punishment, perpetrated on these tiny, alive infants? proven in study after study to be capable of feeling pain?
Here's what the justices of the Supreme Court, recently ruled regarding "cruel and unusual punishment":
6/12/06 "U.S. Supreme Court Allows New DNA Evidence & Challenging of Lethal Injections"
WASHINGTON - Today's decision of the Supreme Court Justices that makes it easier for inmates who want to get a new hearing on DNA evidence that was not used at their trials; & another to contest lethal injections used countrywide for executions, provide a deeper look into the tenets of capital punishment, with fresh optimism for stagnating appeals cases. The vote was unanimous in allowing condemned inmates to make special federal court claims that the chemicals used in executions are too painful, therefore amounting to unconstitutional cruel and unusual punishment. Lethal injection has become more contested, in part after a 2005 study published in the Lancet Medical Journal questioned whether a painkiller administered at the start of an execution can wear off before the execution is completed..
As to the claims of necessity to the mother in favor of the big money making partial-birth abortion procedure by the abortion-doctors, abortion clinics, special interest groups, politicians that use the issue in campaigns, and body part harvesters that sell the baby parts for transplants, the following leading medical authorities had this to say in their September, 2000 testimony:
The Physicians' Coalition Of Truth: "Partial-birth abortion is never medically necessary to protect a mother's health or future fertility. On the contrary, this procedure can pose a significant threat to her immediate health and future fertility."
The American Medical Association: "We cannot find any satisfactory reason in which the partial-birth abortion procedure was the only safe and effective abortion method."
Dr. Pamela Smith, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Chicago, IL: "The abortion methods used in this ( pba ) procedure are associated with a range of complications, including excessive bleeding, infertility, and even death."
Dr. Everett Koop, Former Surgeon General of the U.S.A: "In no way can I twist in my mind that the late term abortion as described, is a medical necessity for the mother. It certainly can't be a medical necessity for the baby."
September, 2000 - Representative Dick Armey R-Texas: "Today we're debating a very, very cruel and ugly subject. We're debating on whether or not this nation will tolerate a procedure that takes a baby, forces that baby from the womb, tears a baby's head open and sucks out its brains.We're debating on whether or not this nation will tolerate this cruelty, this horrible, cruel, beastly behavior. If you can't see the inhuman cruelty of this procedure, then I fear for you."
Today, June 16, 2006, this heinous, cruel, inhumane and barbaric procedure of partial-birth abortion is still taking place in our nation; despite the signing into law of the "Partial Birth Abortion Ban of 2003", but disgracefully overturned by activist judges.
Gonzales v. Carhart:
The Supreme Court has agreed to take a case out of Nebraska concerning the constitutionality of the national ban on partial-birth abortion. As you may recall, Congress approved a national ban on the procedure. The law was challenged in three separate cases in the federal court system in Nebraska, New York, and California. In all cases, the ban was declared unconstitutional. The high court will hear the case out of Nebraska. The "American Center for Law and Justice", which has been involved in defending the national ban since its passage by Congress, is supporting the government's position defending the ban and will represent members of Congress in filing an amicus brief with the high court. The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in the case next term - in the fall of 2006. The case is Gonzales v. Carhart, 05-380.
Friends, if you agree that the killing of alive infants in the partial-birth abortion procedure is certainly "cruel and unusual punishment" you can help by making your opinions known. Tell your friends who may be considering the procedure, not knowing the facts. If you have judicial activism in your state, regarding the overturning of the "Partial Birth Abortion Ban of 2003," please contact the activist judges with your concerns.
And also, very importantly, when you go to the polls to elect your government representatives, know their position regarding partial-birth abortion. That will tell you more about them, how they regard the sanctity of human life and the upholding of your Constitutional - individual rights, than any other issue.
For I must echo the sentiments of Representative Dick Armey - R-Texas, in Sept, of 2000, when debating this excruciating issue: "If you can't see the inhuman cruelty of this procedure, then I fear for you."
Please your friends about this blog: http://www.gerrymkaye.org/cruelunusualpunishment.html
"Telling It Like it Is" - Current Features &
"The Incredible Congressional Abortion Debate of Sept. 2000" | "Senate Testimony on Roe v. Wade".
IN THE NEWS:
10/2/06 "Senate Democrats Vote Down Interstate "Minor-Abortion-Parental-Notice Bill"
6/17/06 ''Court Challenge To National Motto, ''In GOD We Trust'' Dismissed''
Numberless, Innocent, Endangered Babies Need Your Support Issues & Candidates That Have a Heart...
And That SERVE TO UPHOLD THE LAWS OF THE LAND
And Give Our Nation Back Its Dignity!
"THECHANGE" WE REALLY NEED" | "CRUEL & UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT:.For Innocent.Babies, Too?" |
"HELPINGWOMEN TO.MAKE THE.BEST.CHOICE"
Join In the "Jun. 13, 2006 - Prayer Across America"
Featured: URGENT.You Can Help To Save Lives!
Murder is against the law. So why is it "legal" to murder our babies?.
FEATURED:."MAKING A CHOICE WITH TRUTH" - INFO, Maternity AID / HELP.|."DEPRESSION & ABORTION"
ON FAITH AND JUSTICE
The Partial Birth Abortion Ban Is Passed But Activist Judges Are Refusing To Uphold The Ban:
Your House of Representatives. | .Your Senators Click On: Find By "State,"
The President, your State Governor & Reps., and please urge them to help save our poor, innocent, brutally killed babies,
and to uphold the ban.
The ACLJ - Gonzales v. Carhart, 05-380
In The NEWS:
6/08/06 "Terrorist-Murderer-al-Zarqawi Dead as Iraq's PM Approves Ministers".
"THE AMENDMENT TO DEFINE MARRIAGE: IN DEBATE?"
"Global Day Of Prayer- 2006"
TRANSLATE this page automatically.< Various European and Japanese, Korean, and Chinese.
Translate In Arabic
Enter the HTTP of the page. Translator.HELP. .
CURRENT & New Features
News Reports- Science-Health - Featured Reports.|."On Depression"
GOD Reign Publishing
"GerryBlog.com" - "CRUEL & UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT", For Innocent Babies,Too?
(c) copyright 2000-2006 by Gerry M. Kaye. All rights reserved.